Husband not liable under IPC Section 377 for unnatural sex with wife: MP High Court

 

Congress MLA Umang Singhar has got a major relief as the Madhya Pradesh High Court quashed an FIR against him filed by his wife for unnatural sex.

The court ruled that a husband cannot be liable for non-consensual "unnatural sex" with his wife, observing that the relationship between the husband and wife cannot be confined to their sexual relationship only for the purpose of procreation.

The court said that Section 375, which defines "rape" under the IPC excludes marital sexual relations from its purview.

The further stated that a husband cannot be held liable under Section 377 of IPC for non-consensual "unnatural" since Indian law presently does not recognise marital rape.

Congress MLA Singhar had filed a petition under Section 482 of CrPC for quashing the FIR registered on the fulcrum of a complaint made by his wife against him for the offences punishable under several sections of the IPC.

Justice Sanjay Dwivedi ordered to quash FIR citing the Supreme Court judgment in the Navtej Singh Johar case, wherein the top court had ruled that a consensual sexual relation between homosexual persons is not a crime.

"When same act as per the definition of Section 375 is not an offence, then how it can be treated to be an offence under Section 377 of the IPC," the Court said.

concerning offences under Section 294 (obscene acts or songs) and Section 506 (criminal intimidation) of the IPC, terming it to be a malicious prosecution.

Further, the Court also found that there was no allegation of any dowry demand to allege the commission of an offence under Section 498A (cruelty to woman) IPC.